Why Euthanasia Should Be Legal Essay

Imagine a person who is suffering from AIDS that is at the terminal stage, medication and treatments doesn’t affect their body anymore, and the only thing that can ease the pain is euthanasia. There are many terminal sicknesses on the planet, that there is a huge shot that you will sooner or later know somebody who is critically ill. The word ‘euthanasia’ is derived from the Greek – EU, ‘good’, and Thanatos, meaning ‘death”. Some people think of it as mercy killing, and others see it as murder. I will examine why the slippery slope is a false notion, why legitimate pain management isn’t enough for the individuals who are in constant agony and why sanctioning euthanasia won’t undermine critical medical services and therapeutic administrations. Euthanasia is a merciful means to end long-term suffering.

Slippery slope makes the claim that if some specific kind of action (such as euthanasia) is permitted, then society will be inexorably led to permitting other actions that are morally wrong (Benatar, 2011). People who are against assisted suicide are afraid that it will lead to involuntary suicide to people that are legally bound to the procedure. According to Code Section 127.800, et. seq. (The Oregon Death with Dignity Act) only terminally ill patients can undergo euthanasia. This fear on slippery slope undermines the effectiveness of the laws that are currently in place. Overall, if no risk is existent in accidentally or involuntarily euthanizing patients, then only the people who are willing can do it.

Pain management on terminally ill patients will not alleviate them from suffering. Pain medications only alleviates that of the physical state. Terminally ill patients experience emotional pain as well. Although pain may not be the most prevalent symptom at the end of life, it is the most feared. Pain steals both the quality and satisfaction of remaining life, contributes to anxiety, depression, despair, loss of self-efficacy, and interferes with medical decision-making (Broglio & Cole, 2011).

Palliative care is extremely helpful, and it is fair to say that legalizing euthanasia will undermine the effectiveness of medicinal services and therapeutic administrations. A substantial proportion of people with a euthanasia request are seen by palliative care services, and for a majority of these, the request is then granted, often with the involvement of palliative care services in the decision-making or the actual performance of euthanasia (Dierickx, Deliens, Cohen, & Chambaere, 2017). Studies suggest that health professionals working in palliative care are likely to be confronted frequently with euthanasia requests, regardless of their personal attitudes toward assisting people in dying (Dierickx, Deliens, Cohen, & Chambaere, 2017).

To some people euthanasia is murder because it is premeditated. It is believed that no one has the right to end the life of another individual, it has been stated in numerous religious texts. A lot of people think that doctors and other medical providers will have too much power, and fear that they will abuse and impose their will on vulnerable patients. Lastly It is not good to end somebody’s life because they have the right to live longer. The main idea here is that life should be advocated and celebrated.

If a terminal patient faces a long, moderate, difficult death, unquestionably it is a lot kinder to save them this sort of anguish and enable them to end their life serenely. It isn’t as though they are ‘living’; they are just holding on to bite the dust. They ought to have the privilege to avoid this sort of agonizing existence and be permitted to peacefully die. People should respect other people’s decision whether they decide to end their suffering due to a terminal condition. When a person is infected of a uncurable disease and the disease is contagious, not only does it end the suffering of the individual but also prevents the spread of the disease.

Euthanasia is a merciful means to end long-term suffering. Euthanasia has raised too many controversies because many people agrees with it and many do not. Dying is an unavoidable truth and a significant puzzle. Death reaches us all, yet every individual encounter it in manners that are just not available to the relative or doctor. On a fundamental level, humane and dexterous consideration for the unfortunate is a social commitment and a personal offering from those included. Both society and people miss the mark concerning what is sensible, if not simply, reachable.

Cite this page